elf: We have met the enemy and he is us. (Met the enemy)
[personal profile] elf

Kirtsaeng vs Wiley, US Supreme Court
Oral Arguments; Oct 29, 2012
(First Sale Doctrine case)

LINK TO ORIGINAL: Transcript at EFF site
~10,500 words total.


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPAP KIRTSAENG, DBA
BLUECHRISTINE99 Petitioner

v.

JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.

No. 11-697

Washington, D.C. Monday, October 29, 2012

The above-entitled matter came on for oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States at 11:05 a.m.

Appearances )

 

Contents )

P R O C E E D I N G S

(11:05 a.m.)

E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ, on behalf of Petitioner )

 

THEODORE B. OLSON, ESQ, on behalf of Respondent )

 

MALCOLM L. STEWART, as amicus curiae, supporting Respondent )

 

E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ, rebuttal on behalf of Petitioner )

elf: Computer chip with location dot (You Are Here)
[personal profile] elf
Tenenbaum copyright (torrenting) ruling
Dec 7, 2009
Link to original: http://www.scribd.com/doc/23790774/Fair-Use-Memorandum-and-Order-in-Sony-v-Tenenbaum
Other docs: http://www.scribd.com/doc/23790774/Fair-Use-Memorandum-and-Order-in-Sony-v-Tenenbaum

Case 1:07-cv-11446-NG Document 22 Filed 12/07/2009

Sony v Tenenbaum Header & Contents )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS


SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
JOEL TENENBAUM, Defendant.

Case No. 07cv11446-NG

GERTNER, D.J.:

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


December 7, 2009
I. Introduction )
II. Equitable Defense )
III. Summary Judgment/A. Legal Standard )
B. Fair Use Standard )
C. Fair Use Analysis )
IV. Conclusion )

Footnotes )
elf: Pie chart with question mark (Pie Chart of Fail)
[personal profile] elf
Salinger Copyright Ruling, complete text: 8400 words
7/1/2009

LINK TO ORIGINAL: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/20090701salinger.pdf
(Searchable PDF w/bookmarks & Word document also available on request. Email me.)

Salinger v Colting header )

Plaintiff J.D. Salinger brings suit against Defendants Fredrik Colting, writing under the name John David California, Windupbird Publishing Ltd., Nicotext A.B., and ABP, Inc., doing business as SCB Distributors Inc., alleging claims for Copyright Infringement and common law Unfair Competition. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants' novel, 60 Years Later; Coming Through the Rye (hereinafter "60 Years"), is a derivative work of his novel, The Catcher in the Rye (hereinafter "Catcher"), and that the character of Mr. C from 60 Years, is an infringement on his character, Holden Caulfield, from Catcher.

Plaintiff now moves for a preliminary injunction preventing Defendants from publishing, advertising, or otherwise distributing 60 Years in the United States of America during the pendency of this suit. For the following reasons, a preliminary injunction is GRANTED.
I. Introduction )
II. Discussion A. The Preliminary Injunction Standard )
B. The Fair Use Doctrine )
C. Applying the Four Factor Analysis to 60 Years )
III. Conclusion )

Footnotes )

Profile

legaldocs: First page of legal ruling (Default)
Legal Documents

October 2012

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829 3031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 24th, 2017 03:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios